Archive for the ‘MSM’ Category

Petition to Impeach and/or expel Senator Obama, 1000 signatures, Comments reveal disgust, Obama, media, MSM, Americans voice opinions, Democrat Convention, Congress

August 16, 2008

The Petition to Impeach and/or expel Senator Obama is gathering
steam. Over 1,000 petitioners have signed on and the majority
have voiced their outrage at Obama and the Main Stream Media, MSM.
Most Americans are shocked at the free ride and promotion of
Obama by the MSM. This petition is a means for Americans to
be heard. The signers of the petition are also urged to send a
paper copy of the petition or letter of their choosing to their
senators and representatives.

Some have asked if the petition will be presented to Congress.
The answer is yes!

We will attempt to make the Democrat Party Delegates aware of
the petition as well. You can help in this effort.

Some have questioned if a senator can be impeached.
The answer is, technically yes. However the petition is worded
to request impeachment and/or expulsion from the senate.

This petition is a grassroots effort from Democrats, Republicans
and Independents. This petition receives no funding.

The most important aspect of the petition is getting the attention
of the American people, MSM and Congress with the core problems
with Barack Obama. The offenses listed on the petition are more
of the legal and abuse of power kind. While there are many more
troubling aspects of Obama and his past, the ones considered
to be more “impeachable” were included.

Please tell as many people as you can about the petition.

View and sign The Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Democratic Convention Denver, 2008, Democrats, Delegates, Super Delegates, Harold Ickes, Hillary supporters, Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama

August 16, 2008

Delegates, Super Delegates, Hillary Clinton supporters, concerned citizens of the United States. The truth about Senator Obama is emerging. An increasing number of Americans see Obama for the ultra left wing, corruption entangled liar that he is. The Republicans are waiting until after the convention to reveal all the dirt they have on Obama and there is a lot of it. New books on Obama that have recently been published and persistent internet bloggers have revealed the truth about Obama despite the best attempts of the Obama Camp and MSM to cover up the truth.

There is a Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama. The petition is gaining steam and exposure. The petition will be presented to both houses of Congress. We urge you to read the petition and take it’s charges as well as comments from those signing it serious. The American public is fed up with politics as usual, the chicanery of this recent campaign and the irresponsibility of the MSM.

         A PETITION

                        for

The Impeachment of Senator Barack Obama
     

TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama is an admitted illegal drug user and
is believed to have used illegal drugs as recently as November 1999
or more recently. Mr. Obama has maintained contact with other
admitted illegal drug users.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has maintained regular contact
with known criminals such as Antoin (Tony) Rezko and other
criminal elements in Chicago and Illinois. Mr. Obama has
conducted business with these criminals and received campaign
donations from them. Mr. Obama was compelled to return an estimated $250,000 in
donations related to Tony Rezko.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has consistently lied about his
contact with convicted criminal Tony Rezko. The Tony Rezko
corruption trial revealed that FBI mole John Thomas helped investigators
“build a record of repeat visits to the old offices of Rezko and former
business partner Daniel Mahru’s Rezmar Corp., at 853 N. Elston, by
Blagojevich and Obama during 2004 and 2005,” according to the February
10, 2008 Chicago Sun-Times.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has engaged in unscrupulous business
practices, in particular with Mr. Robert Blackwell. Mr. Obama
received an $ 8,000 per month “legal retainer” from Mr. Blackwell
for a total of $112,000 and reported the income through his law firm
in a manner not unlike money laundering. Obama, along with Obama
campaign manager Dan Shomon, procured $ 320,000 in state grants
for Blackwell’s company Killerspin. Blackwell companies contributed
over $ 32,000 to the Obama campaign in 2007.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama used the office of IL Senator to
facilitate the vote rigging in Chicago as chairman of the Illinois Senate
Health and Human Services Committee. Mr. Obama pushed legislation in Senate Bill
1332 to reduce the number of members of the Health Facilities Planning Board
from 15 to 9. Mr. Obama did conspire with Stuart Levine, Tony Rezko and
Rod Blogojevich to rig the committee and was rewarded with campaign
contributions. The new members appointed included 3 doctors who contributed to
Mr. Obama. On April 21, 2004, Stuart Levine explicitly advised Dr. Robert Weinstein,
who is now indicted, of Tony Rezko’s role in manipulating the Planning Board’s vote.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has engaged in lies and deception
about his past. Mr. Obama lied about his contact level with
convicted criminal Tony Rezko, the amounts and sources of
campaign contributions and encounters with the law. A complaint
has been filed with the Bar Association of Illinois alleging
that Mr. Obama did not answer truthfully all questions on the
application to the bar.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has invoked the FOIA in Illinois
when it was politically expedient and ignored or violated the
FOIA at other times. In the Illinois Senate proceedings of
Mr. Obama, in Senate Bill 1416, pleads the importance of businesses
bidding on state contracts having improved access to FOIA data. When
later questioned about his records during his term in the IL
Senate, Mr. Obama gave evasive answers or refused to supply records.

Whereas: The First Amendment provides a right for the people “to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Precedents
exist for impeachment and expulsion of a US Senator. Senator William
Blount was impeached by the House on July 7, 1797 and expelled by
the Senate the next day.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the People, Undersigned,
being citizens of the United States and residents in the Cities and States so
indicated, HEREBY Demand that the Congress of the United States begin
immediate impeachment and/or expulsion proceedings against Senator
Barack Obama.

      Addendum: Petition to Impeach Senator Obama

We were urged to add the following information about Senator Obama.
This comes under the topic of lies and deception but also falls under more
serious charges of abuse of power and possible violation of the Logan Act.
Those signing the petition prior to this addendum will be identified.

August 4, 2008

Whereas: As a US Senator, Barack Obama violated the stated intention of
his 2006 Official Government Visa to Africa by publicly propagandizing
for his cousin, Railla Odinga against the US democratic ally of Kenya.
Whereas the stated “mission” of Senator Obama’s Official Visa, according
to the Kenya Office of Public Communications, was to “nurture relations
between the Continent and the United States” he, instead, made public
protest before Kenya citizens to rally against their leadership,
invoking a need for “Change!” and accusing this US allied nation of
“corruption.” In Official Protest of Mr. Obama’s passport abuse and
misconduct, Kenya’s government cited his “extremely disturbing
statements on issues which it is clear, he was very poorly informed, and
on which he chose to lecture the Government and the people of Kenya on
how to manage our country.” Whereas, furthermore, there is no public
record of any sanctions or reprimand by the US Congress of Senator
Obama’s passport violation or campaigning on foreign soil against a US
ally, history has since recorded the broadspread destruction of Kenya’s
economy and large scale loss of life as a result of the violence
instigated by Odinga’s ODM campaign there.

 

Visit the petition site:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama presidency, Dangers, Main Stream Media, MSM, ODM Action Plan as Executed in Obama’s US Campaign: A Checklist Comparison, Part 3, Jacquerie, Obama Nation, Corsi

August 11, 2008

We have received a 3 part series of articles on Obama, Kenya and Obama’s ties to Raila Odinga, Islam, communists and Obama’s hidden agendas. We are presenting the articles as we received them. For more information about Obama and his Kenya connections, read the new book by Jerome Corsi, “Obama Nation.” Here is the Last of three parts:

ODM Action Plan as

Executed in Obama’s US

Campaign: A Checklist

Comparison 

By Jacquerie

Part 3

 

1. Both candidates represent radical factions. Obama’s short list includes Rezko, with his secret MidEast money trail; Wm Ayres with whom he funded Muslim causes; Farrakan, head of the Nation of Islam and many others. 
 
 
 
 


2. Both campaigns are substantially funded by secret
PACs, multi-layering contributions which makes them difficult to trace. 

3, Both use propaganda denouncing ‘Corruption.” The theme of Obama speeches in Kenya for Odinga have been echoed throughout his own US campaign.   

       
4. Both employ vague rhetoric extolling the need for “
CHANGE!” – the same Kenya ODM battle cry heard, ad nauseum, in Obama’s campaign here.


5. Each identify themselves as leaders of a “
Movement” – as if to deflect attention away from the candidate to incite “mob” energy, most often extolling popular platitudes rather than addressing specific issues.


5. Both employ core strategy of “seek(ing) to elevate the emotions within young constituents
.” Consider D. Brazille’s boasts of Obama’s popularity with new voters as well as his primary season targeting of college campuses. Lowest of all these youth grab tactics, may be the current explicit democratic party sponsored internet sex ads, which suggests that single young men will be sex-deprived if they support the senior McCaine over the hip Obama.


6. Ridicule of “old people.” is a strategy to usurp respect for existing leadership. The ODM candidate, by contrast, is surrounded by the youthful “promise of a buoyant future.” Just last week 2 young MSM bloggers extolled how
“cool and hip Obama is” describing McCaine as “old and dumpy.” The insinuation is McCain is unfit to lead because of his age. Similar internet insults of both Clintons were rampant during the primary season. One would think we were voting for American Idol, not the leader of the free world!


7 The ODM Action Plan call –
trigger a class war” by focusing on issues of “ disparity ” explains why Obama, the candidate who touts up “unity” routinely engenders divisiveness between virtually all interest groups. Surely, we recall classic strategy of ancient Roman – to “divide and conquer.”


8. ODM’s adage: “Elevate emotions to gain protest votes” is the “conquest” which follows the incitement of “class warfare” to divide. As a middle aged American, I’ve always been familiar with references to the “middle class” as our country’s great strength. In Obama’s clever dissembling of the “middle class,” we have been subtly shifted to the language of the “
working class “ the “ working poor ”, etc. Clearly the “middle class” is Obama’s worst enemy were it to remain one cohesive  
 
 
 
 
 
 

voting bloc. His background of “black theology” holds “middle class-ness” in         contempt as exemplified by many of Reverend Wright’s tirades, Michelle Obama speeches and Obama’s own“ bittergate ” comments . His more recent energy-solution of giving up “your SUV’s and his open disdain for English speaking Americans in Europe follow the same line.


9. When it comes to “reinforce promises of jobs and economic gains
to supporters and “retain discipline among the party leadership, we can see a summary of Dean and Axelrod’s            illegitimate Super Delegate sweep, in flagrant violation of the voters in numerous state primaries. Could be the Obama campaign has, as the ODM plan instructs, been “ remind(ing) these party leaders of their own vulnerability.”


10. Come election day, the ODM call for “manipulation of voter turn-out
” with “ discouragement of voter participation in hostile areas.” This was reflected in innumerable reports of Caucus fraud in this spring’s campaign. These were so intentional as to demonstrate careful     advance planning. As we all know, it was these caucuses that established Obama’s press “momentum.”  Caucus outcomes, which hardly reflected the “Will of the People, were reported to include aggressive participation busloads of youthful Obama supporters. As caucuses, historically, have involved small groups of local political devotees, verifying documentation of residency, etc. are not usually part of the rules of that process.


11.  We could call last one “when all else fails
”, since the ODM even planned a strategy for “winning” – vehemently implimented after Odinga lost the popular vote. Well organized riots and violence followed large, advance sales of machetes, carried along with gasoline cans, by ODM supporters, into predominantly Christian areas. There was no question, in the eyes of the world, that those who refused to support Odinga were punished with homelessness and even death. Threats , even of death, against critics of Obama, have been shocking and frequent. These include more than one online stopobama publisher, a popular AA radio host driven into early retirement, another PA talk radio opponent, as well as a woman activist who heads an anti-obama group. As for the topic of rigged election, bloggers have reported the formation and threats of “Recreate 68,” as far back as April. This well organized, well funded radical group’s website not only recruits “protesters” for the August convention (should Obama still meet with opposition) but offers techniques and strategies for intimidating convention delegates and inciting violence around the site.  
 
 
 
 
 
 

All the above together barely equal the greatest power of persuasion in the ODM Action Plan: the manipulative use of the telecommunications industry – on all levels, from internet bloggers and forums to viral emails, from major newspapers to radio stations and mainstream TV, as well as affiliate magazines. Obama, as many well know, has perfected the channeling of his misinformation network to an Orwellian art form.  

Having wistfully hoped that the pro-Obama media barage might diminish post primary season, just the opposite is happening. That the American public has slept through the gradual  takeover of our airwaves is explained by the fact that MainStreamMedia is controlled by a relatively short list of corporate giants, as follows. The full list is longer, but here is a brief:  

CNN is owned by Time Warner, which also owns AOL, Road Runner, People, Fortune, Turner and HBO – and, among other holdings, now provides digital phone service.  

CBS is owned by Viacom which also owns many TV stations as well as 116 radio stations.  

MSNBC and NBC are owned by GE, which merged with Microsoft/Microsoft tried to buy out yahoo/google. Gannet, also a partner with GE owns NY Times, Washington Times and Tribune, USA today, many military publications and many UK newspapers. Paxxon Communications, with many radio stations its holdings is also a partner to GE. 

GE , the world’s largest corporation, also builds aircraft engines, produces turbines and equipment for nuclear reactors and power plants, military hardware and owns numerous finances commercial investments, manufactures industrial systems, medical systems and transportation monitoring systems. As the consummate military machine, GE is recently under fire for doing business with Iran despite its denials of doing so.

 

In review of this list, it doesn’t take much imagination to realize the record-breaking Obama media buys get a big bang for their buck, in establishing partisan bias on TV networks millions rely on for “objective information.” Even beyond TV ‘news” few Americans realize that corporate media control extends throughout news magazines, newspapers, across radio waves and the internet as well. It is worth noting that the largest holdings are also affiliated with military and energy investments. Obama’s recent FISA vote to protect telecoms may be no coincidence either. 
 
 
 
 
 


The Obama campaign’s  unprecedented manipulation of public media even includes reports of
subliminal sabotage of his primary opponent’s video ads. Respect for the first Amendment of the US Constitution not being a priority in the ODM approach to winning at all costs.  

The Battle for “Public Opinion” undertaken by the Obama campaign doesn’t even stop with US voters. A portion of his Official Campaign website dedicated to a “Global Campaign” stated that “you don’t have to be American to have a vote in this election!” Although that feature, like so many has vanished under scrutiny, another astute observer picked up on Obama’s “ Beyond National Action ” campaign.   Here is a small sampling of other “scrubbed web links.”  

Another alarming peculiarity of Obama’s website is a KIDS FOR OBAMA program. This originally opened with a statement encouraging children under 12 to influence this election, saying “Studies have proven that children can influence the votes of their parents and older siblings. . . . Get involved!” Like Obama’s own version of the Presidential Seal, this suspicious statement has been discarded. However, the activity of indoctrinating children has only expanded. The campaign’s organized activities for kiddies include: writing your local news editors, finding a pen pal” and, how about “ take an adult to the polls on election day and encourage them to vote for you by voting for Senator Obama .” The first key step in this indoctrination program starts with hosting a party or sleep-over. As the photo on this page shows, your child and their innocent guests will get a good talking to by an adult Obama recruiter.

Read on for the push to remain “ really dedicated to the cause ” by sharing in

Obama blogs – with other new friends from far-away places. This all looks so cheery, what’s it got to do with the ODM? Remember their Action Plan’s is founded upon “ emotionally exciting youth .” The only other historic and overt mobilization of mere children, outside of Jihad terrorism, were under Hitler and Mao. Both were terrifyingly successful. The young, after all, are most liable to identify with excitable, idealistic rhetoric as well as blind hero worship .    

Bearing in mind that the ODM consider a campaign to be no less than a war, and that Islamic terrorists believe lies are acceptable tactics in this war, one can understand that the more people you can get to believe your lies, the more pressure you can exert upon those who do not. “If a lie may be caused to appear to be more “plausible” by standards of popular opinion or something like that, we are told that we must show respect for the feelings of the liar, and must thus       embrace the lie, and damn the truth.”  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The ODM’s most glaring lie of all, was Odinga’s denial of Muslim afilliation – until his secret accord with the NAMLEF was leaked to the press. Bearing in mind, Obama’s ongoing relationship with Odinga and this US Senator’s support of the ODM campaign, the agreement which Odinga signed with Muslim leaders should be under the scrutiny of Congress and all Americans who support Obama for President. Coincidentally, Odinga, like Obama, claims to be a Christian which is strange, considering the contents of his signed Sharif agreement for Kenya. It could value American voters to recognize that Odinga attempted to deny and hide this agreement, excerpts of which follow here:  

Odinga’s Memorandum of Understanding with National Muslim Leaders includes the following commitments:

1. “ An immediate ban on women’s public dress .. swine meat factories are to be closed down and all alcoholic beverages prohibited. ” 2. “The Council of Islamic Leaders are given oversight to monitor all other religions and all religious activity requires their approval.” 3. Christian “Gospel preaching is outlawed on KBC, the National broadcaster.” 4. “ The Kenya Anti-Terror Police Unit (ATPU) are to be disbanded.” 5. Within 6 months of Odinga assuming leadership the Kenya constitution is to be rewritten, recognizing Sharif as the only law in Muslim declared regions.” 6. Sharif courts are to be set up within 1 year and Islam is to be popularized as the only true religion (in said regions) with

primary schools throughout all Kenya to conduct daily madrassa classes. 7. All Muslims residing in Kenya are to be granted full National Identity cards within 6 months of Odinga sworn in as President” . . . . . . . . . .                                   and, of vital interest to US and international security: 8. No Muslim in Kenya, whether citizen or visitor, shall be subjected to laws of a foreign       country and any seized for Terrorism or any other international crime will only be tried in Kenya and given choice of defense, at the expense of the Kenya government.”    

This is a synopsis of some edicts in the agreement Odinga signed. This last point quoted appears to make Kenya an absolute refuge for all international terrorists . It is neither reasonable nor    responsible to imagine that Obam is unaware of this orange -alert Agreement signed on by the candidate he supported for Kenya’s presidency! Obama’s own tenuous stands on Iraq, Iran and terrorism could jump this up to a red-alert.  

Connecting the dots from the US to Kenya and beyond  

Some say Barack is the Manchurian Candidate. Others claim he is a Muslim. The Christian missionaries, whose letters began this investigative inquiry are convinced he is at the center of a well planned international jihad. Not 
 
 
 
 
 
 

surprisingly, they refuse to make further public statements in concern for their personal safety. Since when have death threats been a systematic aspect of Presidential politics? Since Obama brought the ODM to America! As one who initially perceived Obama to be a pawn in a Republican game to knock out Hillary Clinton, months of exhausting research has now indicated there is much more beneath his campaign’s idyllic image. The Muslim verses Christian question is worth examination because it speaks to not only his affiliations, but his values and intention. On that note, the following facts are enlightening and substantiated:  

1. One observer notes “ Islam, today, is a political and military movement masquerading as a religion. ” Controversy about Obama’s Muslim affiliations are a viable political issue, just as his socialist connections are. We are all aware that America, as a nation, was founded in freedom of religion. However, it was also founded in separation of church and state. The current Jihad, vehemently publicly pronounced upon Western culture, uses religion to espouse anti-American and violent political action. It is, then, politics in the guise of religion. This, then, makes it a     legitimate National Security issue. Obama consistently avoids publicity about his original political power base, with its blend of Islamic

and socialist connections including Rezko, Auchi, Ayres, Pfleger and even including Nation of Islam members, employed in his campaign offices. Why? Obama also ducks questions- or issues denials – related to his Muslim heritage and allegiances that have supported and endorsed him and to which he has contributed. Why? While Obama disclaims his Islamic connections, he is openly, publicly endorsed by the leaders of major fascist and terrorist regimes including: HAMAS, Iran and most recently North Korea . Why?  

2. While Obama continues to insist he is a practicing Christian, during his childhood attendance in a Catholic school, in Indonesia, he was listed as a Muslim and, thus, exempted from religious training. When he transferred to a Muslim school his education included daily Islamic education and prayer. Attempts to sort out the facts of his background demonstrate that Obama’s own first biography, “Dreams of My Father” is broadly laced with fictitious recollections. His only recorded Christian affiliation as an adult with TUCC, follows black theology tenets more political than religious. Along with his numerous Muslim family connections and endorsements, Obama’s brand of Christianity smacks more of radical political activism that it represents recogized doctrines of Jesus Christ.  Recently, his misuse of the Bible for campaign stumping has been condemned by a well known Christian radio host, And despite his current vote luring emphasis on the importance of faith, here is a puzzling, little known Obama quote: 
 
 
 
 
 

 

“At some fundamental level, religion …. (is) the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts . . . to base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments would be sublime.To base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing.” excerpt from July 3, 2006 interview with Pulitzer prize winning reporter, Jim Hoagland.

3. First cousins, Obama and Odinga maintain contact. Odinga’s recent US visit (virtually ignored by US media) has placed him in a powerful position of negotiating diplomatic and financial agreements with the US, in the name of Kenya, in his“negotiated” post of Prime Minister (which was Odinga’s prize for calling off the street violence.  Obama played an active role in these      “negotiations” but has maintained silence about the ODM’s wholesale slaughter of Kenyans and Odinga’s Sharia commitment to Muslim Sharia rule. “Friends of Senator B.O.” supplied substantial capital to the ODM campaign, as did the Muslim NAMLEF.

4. Obama’s Presidential bid has turned the established Democratic party upside-dowvirtually casting aside voting blocs of the party’s historic base, while mobilizing nearly the entire bloc of African Americans- some say with hints of reparations for slavery, and though while the  candidate avoids that subject, he has avid supporters for whom this is a central cause.   This contingent could become a solid base  – a la ODM class war strategy . His other stronghold, the first time voter bloc (lured by his call for Change!) seems not to notice his ever-shifting stands on crucial issues.  In view of its new demographic emphasis and lack of democratic process, the current Democratic Party could be rightfully called the Obama Democratic Movement.

5. Based on his personal biography, the influences in Barack Obama’s life have been a unique blend of atheistic socialism, accented by a Muslim father and stepfather, Muslim training in his youth, a Communist mentor in his teens, radical promoters of his entrance into politics, a wife whose thesis advocated ‘separatism” over integration, a Middle East backed financier of his early political career and a boundlessly wealthy anti-American backer of his Presidential bid.


-Not only has his campaign been grounded in US radicals and international terrorist endorsements, it is currently establishing an unheard of call for global pressure on this
jihad That Obama is more sympathetic to “Global Interests” than American interests is rather self-evident at this point. The financial ledgers of his campaign are too riddled with $4600 donations (the maximum limit) by the “unemployed” including “unemployed students” and PAC’s to make credible his 
 
 

claim that grass roots internet donors have funded his staggering primary media campaign. This new US ODM party (formerly known as the Democratic party) expects this cash cow to keep delivering and even the most naive can no longer believe this money trail is traceable to small individual contributions. Yet, already down-ticket Democratic candidates are complaining that the 50 state strategic offices focus on Obama to the exclusion of local races. 
 
6. At the same time, Obama networking within the terrorist web seems to carry on, below the radar of public attention. Why did the
Gaza Strip have a  Palestinian phone bank calling for support of his primary campaign? And why has there been so little press on his diplomatic misspeak regarding Iran ? No Presidential candidate in history has so arrogantly and irresponsibly extended his global outreach, prior to earning the White House. Why, for instance, was Governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, a potential Obama running mate, meeting with Venezuala’s Hugo Chavez , a vocal anti-American progapandist? Was it mere coincidence that not long after Chavez flew to Cuba for meetings with Castro? Here are other questions worth asking?

  
Why did Obama dash from a GM worker meet-and-greet in Michigan, with no time to answer questions, only to dash to a pre-arranged meeting with
Qazwini , a chief US fundraiser for the terror corps Hezbollah? Could we believe that Obama is so naive he does not know that the Secretary of Homeland Security has said Hezbollah makes Al Queda look like a minor league? Why were 2 young Muslim women , at a rally, removed from camera view and not reported by MSM to be members of a Sunni terrorist arm? And why does Obama seem confident of winning Michigan despite disenfranchising the Democratic voter base there? Is it because Michigan has one of the highest US populations of Muslims?    

Why was Odinga , Obama’s Kenya ODM counterpart, recently hosted by US Secretary of State, Finance Committee, and other high US officials with only sketchy news of these meetings coming from overseas press? And why would his lobbying for Class A Kenya air status into US air fields even be considered, in view of his signed intention to provide haven for terrorists in Kenya, with no extradition? Why has Obama, who holds dual citizenship with Kenya, after       ignoring Odinga’s slaughter there, or any meeting the two recently had here in US, shifted attention on condemning similar tactics in Zimbabwe ? And why is our ally, Kenya’s “Grand Coalition” government showing favor in selling their oil to Libya below other US friendly offers?  
 
 
 
 

Unfortunately, this expanding web of terrorist allies continues to connect their dots beneath the radar of US media. What they have in common, beneath their seemingly diverse labels, is their fervent anti-Americanism. This web is interwoven into the fabric of ODM’s Muslim pact and the Obama- ODM connection. It’s fair to ask what else the ODM  has in store for an unsuspecting American public? We certainly know enough, however, to answer Lou Dobbs, who in calling the candidate, among other things “soulless” demanded:  “Why is Barack Obama so comfortable with people who hate America?” The answer could lie in the fact that, oddly enough, this US candidate for President is said to discreetly hold dual citizenship in both the US and Kenya , which again begs the question of where this Presidential hopeful’s real allegiances lie? When it comes to uncovering the truth of Obama, the dots seem to go on…. and on…. and on … and, as they do, they only continue to define the dangers of an Obama Presidency.

 

 

Obama Nation, Tony Rezko, Corruption charges, conviction, Jerome Corsi, Obama Corruption, Lies

August 9, 2008

One of the biggest reasons for signing the petition to Impeach Senator Obama, is the well documented, long time, close association between Barack Obama and Tony Rezko. Not only did Obama have close ties to Rezko in many areas of his personal, political and business dealings, but Obama lied about the frequency and level of his ties to Rezko.

In Jerome Corsi’s new book, “The Obama Nation”, Corsi provides a broad picture of Obama and his past. Corsi includes a section on Tony Rezko and corruption in Chicago. Here are some exerpts:

“A small army of Chicago investigative reporters have dug into the story in the last two years, producing a mountain of incriminating evidence against Barack Obama that the mainstream media have failed to make known to the American public nationwide.”

Quoting Evelyn Pringle: “Without Rezko’s fundraising, Obama would not have been elected to the Illinois Senate, or the U.S. Senate,”

“As we will soon see, Rezko’s money ties go back to the Middle East, back to one Islamic money mogul who could be fairly be described as a “bag man” to Saddam Hussein at the height of his Oil for Food scam.”

Jerome Corsi in “The Obama Nation”, provides a good introduction to Obama’s ties to crime and corruption in Chicago, Illinois and the Middle East. For more indepth knowledge of these corruption ties, search this blog and use the reference sources on the Petition site. Also when you visit the Petition site, view the signatures, but especially read the comments from Americans like you. Many people are disgusted with Obama and the main stream media.

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Expel Obama, Impeach Senator Obama, Petition to Impeach Obama, Obama, Media, What people are saying

August 6, 2008

Many people signing the petition to Impeach Senator Obama are supplying comments. The American public is disgusted by the lies and deception of Obama and likewise the MSM, mainstream media, giving Obama a free ride or swooning over him. You probably feel this way. Read the comments coming from your fellow Americans:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/obamaimpeachment/signatures.html

Many people are just as disgusted with the MSM as they are Obama. Many Americans do not know the real Obama because the truth has not been reported. That is one of the reasons for this petition. To inform the American public and Congress. Look at the following quotes from the media:

Dan Rather: “The people who can affect the price of oil would prefer a Republican presidential candidate. Watch the price of oil. If it goes down, which it may very well, it could help John McCain quite a bit.”

The Associated Press: “It’s not only Obama’s youth, eloquence and energy that have stolen hearts across the Atlantic. Obama has raised expectations of a chance for the nation to redeem itself in the role that Europe has loved, respected and relied upon.”

CBS, Mark Phillips: “The 200,000-plus crowd confirmed his rock star status, and his more cooperative sounding rhetoric was what the crowd wanted to hear.”

The New York Times, Alessandra Stanley: “Mr. Obama’s weeklong tour of war zones and foreign capitals is noteworthy because it is so unusual to see a presidential candidate act so presidential overseas.”

MSNBC, Chris Matthews: “I’m thrilled with this. Obama’s strength in the Northeast, the West Coast and the Great Lakes.”

Time, Margaret Carlson: “If there’s anything we need to rescue us from the last eight years, it’s brains, good judgment and experience. Obama has the first two. Gore has all three.”

The Truth from Bob Novak:

“I’ve been covering presidential campaigns since 1960. I have always said I have never seen the media as much entranced by a candidate than when they were in my very first campaign, in 1960, when they were for JFK. But I’m telling you right now, the enchantment with Obama beats the JFK syndrome.”

Bob Novak has recently been diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. Our prayers go out for him.

God Bless Bob Novak.

To read and sign the petition:

http://obamaimpeachment.org/